quote by Condoleezza Rice

Our work has only begun. In our time we have an historic opportunity to shape a global balance of power that favors freedom and that will therefore deepen and extend the peace. And I use the word power broadly, because even more important than military and indeed economic power is the power of ideas, the power of compassion, and the power of hope.

— Condoleezza Rice

Wonderful Historical Military quotations

If we fight a war and win it with H-bombs, what history will remember is not the ideals we were fighting for, but the methods we used to accomplish them. These methods will be compared to the warfare of Genghis Khan who ruthlessly killed every last inhabitant of Persia.


Historical military quote I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sh
I am not afraid of an army of lions led by a sheep; I am afraid of an army of sheep led by a lion.

It is God's job to forgive Osama Bin Laden. It is our job to arrange a face to face meeting.

Sure, we want to go home. We want this war over with. The quickest way to get it over with is to go get the bastards who started it.

I am the very model of a modern Major-General, I've information vegetable, animal, and mineral, I know the kings of England, and I quote the fights historical, From Marathon to Waterloo, in order categorical.

The essence of war is violence. Moderation in war is imbecility.


The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena.

.who errs, who comes short again and again; but who does actually strive to do the deeds; who spends himself in a worthy cause.

The military mind tends to be conservative, realistic and historical.

The civilian mind tends to be liberal, idealistic and Utopian. Journalists, obviously, are civilians, and they tend to distrust, and to suspect, the military's motives.

The information technologies which were historically born from military research are, today, on the verge of developing an offensive capability of destruction, which could tomorrow, if we're not careful, completely destroy world peace.

And while national military forces have historically resisted the full participation of women soldiers, female talent has found plenty of scope in revolutionary and terrorist groups around the planet.

South America has virtually broken away in the last decade.

That's an event of historic significance. South America just doesn't follow US orders. In fact there isn't a single US military base left there.


Historically, when a leader has deployed his own military against civilians, it's never been good. There's never been a time where it's ended well.

The leading, the most respected Vietnam historian, military historian Bernard Fall -he was a hawk incidentally, but he cared for the Vietnamese - he said it wasn't clear to him whether Vietnam could survive as a historical and cultural entity under the most massive attack that any region that size had ever suffered. He was talking about South Vietnam, incidentally.

Historically, several policy domains, including that of foreign policy towards the US and India, budget allocations etc, have been controlled by the Pakistani military, and the civil-military divide can be said to be the most fundamental fracture in Pakistan's body politic.

The Marines estimate that roughly a hundred or 200 women will be interested in going into these jobs - roughly 2 percent of those jobs. Still, this is historic. It's a biggest cultural change in the military maybe ever, probably bigger than integrating the force back in 1948 when African-Americans were no longer segregated in separate units.

What, then is our duty? It is to carefully distinguish the historic moment in which we live and to consciously assign our small energies to a specific battlefield. The more we are in phase with the current which leads the way, the more we aid man in his difficult, uncertain, danger-fraught ascent toward salvation.


The academic mind can eat away the very basis of its own assurance .

.. produce contortions when it tries to bend over backward ... allow itself to be dismayed by the picture it has created of relentless historical process.

At the end of the first half-century of engine-driven flight, we are confronted with the stark fact that the historical significance of aircraft has been primarily military and destructive.

We should be more modest in our belief that we can impose democracy on a country through military force.

NATO remains a military alliance, and we are against having a military alliance making itself at home right in our own backyard; in our historic territory. I simply cannot imagine that we would travel to Sevastopol to visit NATO sailors. Of course, most of them are wonderful guys, but it would be better to have them come and visit us, be our guests, rather than the other way round.