Internet users, that blue screen of death you were looking at this morning? That's the sky. If you're still confused, look it up on Wikipedia tomorrow.— Stephen Colbert
Devotion Wikipedia quotations
The Internet has become a remarkable fount of economic and social innovation largely because it's been an archetypal level playing field, on which even sites with little or no money behind them - blogs, say, or Wikipedia - can become influential.
Wait, Wikipedia isn't working? Why hasn't someone invented a paper version of it? A set of books organized alphabetically by topic?
Leo took out a pen and autographed the arm of one of the nymphs.
“Narcissus is a loser! He’s so weak, he can’t bench-press a Kleenex. He’s so lame, when you look up lame on Wikipedia, it’s got a picture of Narcissus—only the picture’s so ugly, no one ever checks it out.
One thing that I'm really interested in is the kind of esoteric detail that surrounds these great figures. And Wikipedia is full of that kind of stuff, whether it's true or untrue. It staggers me: why, in the short space assigned to a person or an event, that kind of random information is there. To be honest, that's wonderful fuel for songwriting.
The Internet gives you access to a lot of material, and it's fun to sit and read. I go to something like Wikipedia and look at different topics... I find the subject fascinating. I like to read about concepts and mathematicians.
One of the most common questions writers are asked is "Where do you get your ideas?" But the sad truth is, we don't know. Ideas can come at any time and from any direction: in the shower, waiting for an elevator, or while bouncing across Wikipedia pages.
Wikipedia is first and foremost an effort to create and distribute a free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language. Asking whether the community comes before or after this goal is really asking the wrong question: the entire purpose of the community is precisely this goal.
The definition of marriage cannot be disputed.
It's right there in black and white and it's been the same since the start of Wikipedia.
Does anything really matter? We all end up in the same place.
All that's left is our Wikipedia entry.
The proselytisers for man-made global warming have long exercised a tight stranglehold over the contents of Wikipedia.
Wikipedia was offline after an overheating problem at one of its data centers.
It was pretty bad. For a while there, people had nowhere to go for phony, inaccurate information.
I feel like the Internet needs to be disarmed in some way.
There needs to be a philosophical undermining of the Internet. We take it too seriously and too literally. For a reference we go to Wikipedia, which is full of inaccuracies and misinformation. It's kind of beautiful - it's all the product of imagination; it's not reality at all.
Citizendium is based on the failings and unreliability of Wikipedia.
Take it from someone who's read the Wikipedia entry: this is how the Ottoman Empire was won: madden horsemen fueled by lethal jet-black coffee-mud.
Wikipedia is the first place I go when I'm looking for knowledge... or when I want to create some.
If you really want the truth of anything, don't use Wikipedia.
Wikipedia lacks the habit or tradition of respect for expertise.
As a community, far from being elitist (which would, in this context, mean excluding the unwashed masses), it is anti-elitist (which, in this context, means that expertise is not accorded any special respect, and snubs and disrespect of expertise is tolerated).
Free services like Wikipedia I don't think benefit anyone - they don't benefit the professional because they're not paid.
A Wikipedia article is a process, not a product.
Think of how Wikipedia works, how Amazon harnesses user annotation on its site, the way photo-sharing sites like Flickr are bleeding out into other applications. We're entering an era in which software learns from its users and all of the users are connected.
I know Wikipedia is very cool. A lot of people do not think so, but of course they are wrong.
We have lived in this world where little things are done for love and big things for money. Now we have Wikipedia. Suddenly big things can be done for love.
Everybodys saying, be skeptical of Wikipedia.
That is true. They should also be skeptical of everything. We should all be critical consumers of the media.
I do not need wireless access to Wikipedia.
I would prefer to stir-fry my own small intestines than to have continual access to a site where the entry for Klingon is longer than the entry for Latin.
Wikipedia, every day, is tens of thousands of people inputting information, and every day millions of people withdrawing that information. It's a perfect image for the fundamental point that no one of us is as smart as all of us thinking together.
Wikipedia is a victory of process over substance.
Wikipedia is the best thing ever. Anyone in the world can write anything they want about any subject. So you know you are getting the best possible information.
Wikipedia is forcing people to accept the stone-cold bummer that knowledge is produced and constructed by argument rather than by divine inspiration.
I get so sick and tired of Wikipedia. People write their own crap on there.
Wikipedia was a big help for science, especially science communication, and it shows no sign of diminishing in importance.
You can't retrieve you life (unless you're on Wikipedia, in which case you can retrieve an inaccurate version of it).
I'm under stress. They killed me on wikipedia. They killed me. And I didn't stay dead long enough to sell no DVDs. I didn't even stay dead long enough - I was too stupid. I should've stayed low. I should've laid low. I could've been gone for a year; I'd have made money. And then I'd have risen from the dead.
I have always viewed the mission of Wikipedia to be much bigger than just creating a killer website. We're doing that of course, and having a lot of fun doing it, but a big part of what motivates us is our larger mission to affect the world in a positive way.
We talked about the Internet and Wikipedia and how facts and history are being collectively created online.