Andrew Revkin is an American fiction writer and journalist. He is best known for his work at The New York Times, where he has written about environmental issues since 1995. His books include The North Pole Was Here: Puzzles and Perils at the Top of the World and The Burning Season: The Murder of Chico Mendes and the Fight for the Amazon Rainforest.
What is the most famous quote by Andrew Revkin ?
You never know you're in a bubble until it pops.
— Andrew Revkin
What can you learn from Andrew Revkin (Life Lessons)
- Andrew Revkin's work emphasizes the importance of understanding the complexities of environmental issues and the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to address them.
- He also highlights the power of storytelling to engage people on an emotional level and to inspire them to take action.
- Finally, Revkin's work serves as a reminder of the need to consider the long-term consequences of our decisions and to strive for sustainability in our actions.
The most helpful Andrew Revkin quotes that are glad to read
Following is a list of the best Andrew Revkin quotes, including various Andrew Revkin inspirational quotes, and other famous sayings by Andrew Revkin.
We're an amazingly adaptive and resilient species.
Once we put our mind to global warming, I have no doubt we'll figure a way through here that won't lead to utter calamity.
Probably the single-most concrete and substantive thing an American, young American, could do to lower our carbon footprint is not turning off the lights or driving a Prius, it's having fewer kids...we'll soon see a market in baby-avoidance carbon credits similar to efforts to sell CO2 credits for avoiding deforestation.
The aspects of global warming that matter most to people - how rapidly will the seas rise? Are hurricanes already getting stronger? How strong will they get as a result of warming? Those are still immersed in complexity. So in those realms that catch people's attention most, or that get used as symbols by environmental campaigners, those facets really do come with significant back-and-forthing.
I'm trying mostly to ask questions. And not just trying to stake out a position on something, but also trying to define the stuff we agree on. I'm having battles with comment posters trying to insert a little sense of order so it's not just a long pissing match between the edges, which is what I think a lot of the blogosphere is tending to do.
The things that happen are an earthquake, another bomb in Iraq, some big jolt on Wall Street in oil prices, and then you have some new study on drought patterns from climate change. Or another little incremental improvement in photovoltaics. Where do those fit in to the daily stream? They don't.
When I wrote a long story about the retreat of sea ice, I made clear it could go the other way for a while, and that doesn't mean we don't know that a warmer world will have less sea ice. It just means there's a lot of variability and people can pay too much attention to the big swings in one direction or the other.
The responsibility of the scientist or journalist is to convey the context.
If you're talking about the Arctic Sea ice, you have to embrace the reality that there's a huge number of other things that influence that on a year-to-year basis.
Every time someone reads a story about the politics poisoning the global warming stuff it makes it feel like a political story, meaning it's Us and Them, instead of what it is: this profound challenge we face given our energy norms right now, the fuels of convenience toward something new. No matter what the politics are, it's still an enormous transformation that has to take place.
Exploring quotes by Andrew Revkin
There are still people who essentially live in intellectual silos and either read Mother Jones or watch Fox News, based on their worldview. And they pick information out that reinforces it rather than keeping an open mind.
I can tell you many reasons why environmental stories don't get adequate attention in conventional media. Basically, environmental risks don't fit the norms of journalism. They're incremental. We hate incremental.
Scientists are also unnerved by the summer's implications for the future.
..proof that human activities are propelling a slide toward climate calamity...humans may have tipped the balance...a particularly harsh jolt to polar bears.